AWS suffered a region-wide failure. Tens of thousands of apps - Venmo, Reddit, Zoom, Roblox, even Amazon’s own services went dark. But a few didn’t because they ran on @WalrusProtocol, via @SuiNetwork. Let’s unpack why [Research series]↓
The AWS outage was traced to US-EAST-1, the region that quietly powers half the internet. When it failed, the DNS and API layers collapsed, creating a cascade of downtime. Even apps with “backups” went dark because their backups lived in the same region.
So what the huge AWS outage reveals about the internet? That a single failure in Virginia shouldn’t silence a planet and yet it did. And we have built a global web on a local spine and mistook size for stability.
But this failure wasn’t new. It’s the same pattern every time: centralization + convenience → fragility. One provider, one region, one API. All it takes is a single choke point for the web to blink.
Why it matters? In AWS or Google Cloud: - You trust their dashboard when it says “stored successfully.” - If their region fails, you can’t independently prove what data still exists. In Walrus: - Proof is public and decentralized. - Even if some nodes fail, the receipt lets you confirm which fragments remain and where. Walrus replaces trust with verification.
Walrus 🦭/acc
Walrus 🦭/accJun 26, 2025
Most builders don’t think about storage — until it breaks, gets censored, or costs a fortune. That’s why decentralized storage matters. Watch this video to hear why @tuskytools, @plumenetwork, @atoma_network, and @talusnetwork chose Walrus for storage.
Another difference: - AWS assumes uptime: It builds for efficiency and scale, expecting that failures are rare exceptions that can be patched or rerouted. - @WalrusProtocol assumes failure: It’s built under the expectation that nodes will fail - so the system’s survival doesn’t depend on any single node, region, or provider.
Walrus is what we call an antifragile design: a system that doesn’t break when parts of it do. And that’s why during an AWS outage, Walrus-based apps kept running - not because they’re lucky, but because the system doesn’t rely on any single piece to survive.
Stacy Muur
Stacy MuurJul 23, 2025
Think of it like this: Sui = execution + payments Walrus = storage + retrieval Both composable. Store files → attach coins → earn yield → auto-pay for long-term retention. The infrastructure is programmable end-to-end.
Surviving failure is half the story. The other half is knowing and showing that your data never disappeared in the first place. Because Walrus is verifiable continuity, the opposite of “take our word for it.” You can prove not just that you stored data, but where it lives, how it’s replicated, and that it remains retrievable. That’s something no region-bound provider can promise.
The AWS event reaffirmed a bigger truth: Decentralization isn’t about ideology anymore; it’s about survival. Centralized systems fail together. Distributed ones degrade gracefully because the failure is asynchronous. If one node, zone, or cluster fails, the rest continue functioning. Performance might dip slightly, but the system doesn’t collapse and die.
The AWS outage made one thing clear that the “cloud” isn’t the sky, it’s someone else’s data center in Virginia. Walrus spreads that sky across the world; verifiable, permissionless, recoverable. When the web went dark, Walrus didn’t blink because resilience was the premise.
6.94K